ABSTRACT
Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) and caudal block (CB) for analgesia after penile surgery under general anesthesia in the pediatric patients.Methods:Databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI and CBM were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials involving DPNB and CB for penile surgery under general anesthesia in children from inception to September 2021.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.Results:Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 1 271 pediatric patients were enrolled.The results of meta-analysis showed that the requirement for analgesic drugs during recovery was significantly lower in CB group than in DPNB group ( RR=2.54, 95% CI 1.19-5.40, P=0.020); the time of first postoperative activity was significantly shortened ( SMD=-0.68, 95% CI -1.23--0.13, P=0.020), and the incidence of postoperative motor block was decreased ( RR=0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.16, P<0.001) in DPNB group as compared with CB group.There were no significant differences in the incidence of intraoperative block failure ( RR=1.25, 95% CI 0.62-2.51, P=0.530) between two groups.There were no significant differences in objective pain scores at awakening ( SMD=-0.29, 95% CI -0.01-0.59, P=0.050), at 1 h after surgery ( SMD=1.02, 95% CI -1.37-3.41, P=0.400), or at 2 h after surgery ( SMD=0.05, 95% CI -0.59-0.68, P=0.880) between two groups.There were no significant differences in the incidence of agitation during recovery ( RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.14, P=0.150) between two groups.There were no significant differences in the time of first urination ( MD=-84.52, 95% CI -195.72-26.69, P=0.140) between two groups.There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting ( RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.29-1.07, P=0.080) between two groups. Conclusions:DPNB and CB provide similar postoperative analgesic efficacy, but DPNB can prevent the occurrence of postoperative motor block, which is helpful for the postoperative rehabilitation in the pediatric patients undergoing penile surgery with general anesthesia.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of intraspinal analgesia, pudendal nerve block anesthesia and modified perineal protection in combination in midwifery.Methods:A total of 160 primiparous women who were subjected to full-term vaginal delivery in Suqian Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group between January 2019 and January 2021 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo either bilateral pudendal nerve block combined with modified perineal protection (control group, n = 80) or intraspinal analgesia, pudendal nerve block anesthesia and modified perineal protection in combination (observation group, n = 80). Each clinical index was compared between the control and observation groups. Results:Duration of labor in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(7.23 ± 2.11) hours vs. (9.35 ± 3.79) hours, t = 4.27, P < 0.05). Cesarean section rate in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [8.7% (7/80) vs. 52.5% (42/80), χ 2 = 17.18, P < 0.05]. Incidence of perineal tears in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [8.7% (7/80) vs. 32.5% (26/80), χ 2 = 15.48, P < 0.05]. Third-degree perineal tears occurred in neither group. Time of postpartum off-bed ambulation and length of postpartum hospital stay in the observation group were (1.37 ± 0.13) days and (3.22 ± 0.31) days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(2.52 ± 0.22) days, (5.23 ± 0.62) days, t = 25.90, 25.94, both P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [7.5% (6/80) vs. 23.7% (19/80), χ 2 = 8.01, P < 0.05]. There were no significant differences in incidence of neonatal asphayxia, 2-hour postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum hemorrhage between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion:During midwifery of full-term vaginal delivery, combined application of intraspinal analgesia, bilateral pudendal nerve block anesthesia and modified perineal protection can shorten duration of labor and decrease cesarean section rate.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of the caudal block and Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) for transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy.Methods 60 elderly patients with transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal prostate biopsy were randomized into Group A and Group B.Patients in Group A received ultrasound guided caudal block (0.33％ ropivacaine 15 ml) and patients in Group B received TIVA.In operation room (T1),immediately before operation (T2) and at the end of operation (T3),mean artery pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR),breathing rate (BR) and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded.The patients in two groups were rated the level of mini-mental state examination (MMES) at 2 h,8 h and 24 h after operation.Complications during the whole study period were also evaluated.Results The values of MAP,HR and BR of T1 in group B were significantly lower than those at T2 (P＜0.05),and were lower than those in the group A (P ＜0.05).The MMSE value in group A [2 h (25.66 ± 1.71) and 8 h (26.13 ± 1.52)] was significantly higher than that in group B [2 h (27.96 ± 1.71) and 8 h (29.01 ± 0.77)] at after operation (P ＜ 0.05).The rate of usage of ephedrine (13％) and assisted ventilation (20％) in group B was higher.No significant differences were detected in side effects between the two groups.Conclusions Caudal block provides better anesthesia than TIVA for TRUS guided prostate biopsy without an increase of side effects,and it may be safely used during ambulatory surgery.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly characterized by a defect in the anterior abdominal wall with protrusion of abdominal viscera. Perioperative mortality is very high in these patients. Traditionally gastroschisis repair has been performed under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, requiring postoperative intensive care admission and mechanical ventilation. Caudalblock is an attractive alternative to general anesthesia. We present a series of three neonates with gastroschisis, repaired solely under caudal anesthesia.
Resumo Gastrosquise é uma anomalia congênita caracterizada por um defeito da parede abdominal anterior com protrusão de vísceras abdominais. A mortalidade no período perioperatório é muito elevada nesses pacientes. Tradicionalmente, a correc¸ão de gastrosquise tem sido feita sob anestesia geral com intubac¸ão orotraqueal, o que requer internac¸ão em unidade de terapia intensiva e ventilac¸ão mecânica no pós-operatório. O bloqueio caudal é uma opc¸ão atraente à anestesia geral. Apresentamos uma série de três casos de recém-nascidos com gastrosquise corrigida unicamente sob anestesia caudal.
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Gastroschisis/surgery , Anesthesia, CaudalABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine aiding spinal -epidural anes-thesia for sedation.Methods Ninety ASAI -II female patients scheduled for elective spinal -epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into 3 groups(30 cases for each group)according to the digital table method.An epidural catheter was inseted at L2 -3 after satisfactory anesthesia,sedative drugs was intravenous.Group A received midazolam 0.05μg/kg initial loading dose for 10min and maintaining with 0.5μg·kg -1 ·h -1 .Group B received midazolam 0.06μg/kg for 5min and maintaining with 0.5mg·kg -1 ·h -1 .Group C received first intravenous injection of propo-fol 0.5 mg/kg,injection time 60s,maintaining with 0.3 -1.2mg·kg -1 ·h -1 .The infusion rate was adjusted to increase or decrease in order to maintain the desired level of sedation(Ramsay score of 3)during operation.The seda-tion efficacy and adverse reactions of three groups were compared.Results The onset time[(11.2 ±2.8)min]in group A was longer than that of group B[(6.4 ±2.4)min],group C[(5.0 ±2.1)min](t =7.12,9.70,all P <0.05).The offset time of group A,B[(12.3 ±2.4)min,(13.8 ±2.5 )min]were longer then those of group C [(7.4 ±2.3)min](t =8.36,7.95,all P <0.05).But 5 and 6 patients in the group B and C occurred hypoxia,and there were 8 and 9 patients developed partial airway obstruction due to relaxation of jaw muscle.At the time 30min, 60min and the end of surgery,the HR of the group A decreased deeply than the other two groups(t =5.02,4.92, 4.90,3.95,5.71,4.09,all P <0.05),10,5,6 patients were given atropine for increasing the HR in the group A,B and C respectively.Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is more safe and effective for the sedation of spinal -epidural an-esthesia,compared with midazolam and propofol,but with lower HR and longer onset time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of caudal block with dexmedetomidine mixed with lidocaine for management of perioperative analgesia in children. Methods Thirty pediatric patients, aged 2-6 yr, weighing 8-23 kg, scheduled for elective unilateral high ligation of hernial sac, were equally and randomly assigned into either lidocaine group ( group L ) or dexmedetomidine mixed with lidocaine group ( group DL) using a random number table. Each patient received a single caudal dose of 1% lidocaine 1 ml∕kg in group L. Each patient received a single caudal dose of 1% lidocaine 1 ml∕kg mixed with dexmedetomidine 1 μg∕kg in group DL. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using FLACC scale. When FLACC score ≥4, ibuprofen suspension 10 mg∕kg was given orally. The consumption of ibuprofen was recorded within 8 h after operation. The onset time of caudal block and duration of analgesia were recorded, and adverse effects were observed. Results Compared with group L, the onset time of caudal block was significantly shortened, the duration of analgesia was prolonged, and the requirement for ibuprofen was decreased in group L. There was no significant difference in adverse effects between the two groups. Conclusion Addition of dexmedetomidine 1 μg∕kg to caudal lidocaine can significantly optimize the efficacy of caudal block with lidocaine alone for the management of perioperative analgesia in children.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of caudal block with dexmedetomidine mixed with ropivacaine for the management of perioperative analgesia in children.Methods Sixty pediatric patients,aged 1-5 yr,of ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,scheduled for elective hypospadias repair,were equally and randomly assigned into 2 groups using a random number table:ropivacaine group (group R) and dexmedetomidine mixed with ropivacaine group (group DR).Each patient received a single caudal dose of 0.25％ ropivacaine 1 ml/kg in group R.Each patient received a single caudal dose of 0.25％ ropivacaine 1 ml/kg mixed with dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg in group DR.Postoperative analgesia was assessed using FLACC scale,and the degree of motor block was assessed using modified Bromage scale within 24 h after the end of operation.The duration of analgesia (the time from onset of caudal block to first requirement for the rescue analgesic) and development of side effects were recorded.Results Compared with group R,the duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged,and the incidence of bradycardia and oversedation was increased in group DR.Hypoxemia,hypotension and postoperative motor block were not found in either group.Conclusion Addition of dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg to caudal ropivacaine can significantly optimize the efficacy of caudal block with ropivacaine alone for the management of perioperative analgesia in children.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the optimum concentration and dose of ropivacaine for caudal block in the neonates undergoing laparotomy under general anesthesia.Methods One hundred pediatric patients of both sexes,aged 9-30 days,weighing 2.5-4.5 kg,scheduled for elective pyloromyotomy,were randomly divided into 5 groups (n =20 each) using a random number table:control group (group C),0.10％ ropivacaine 1.0 ml/kg group (group 0.1％ L1),0.15 ％ ropivacaine 1.0 ml/kg group (group 0.15 ％ L1),0.10 ％ ropivacaine 1.2 ml/kg group (group 0.10 ％ L2),and 0.15 ％ ropivacaine 1.2 ml/kg group (group 0.15 ％ L2).Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and cisatracurium.The pediatric patients were tracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated.Remifentanil was infused intravenously at 0.2-0.3 μg· kg-1 · min-1 in group C.In 0.10 ％ L1,0.15 ％ L1,0.10 ％ L2 and 0.15％L2 groups,the corresponding concentrations and doses of ropivacaine were injected into the sacral canal under the guidance of ultrasound.The operation was started at 15 min after administration and sevoflurane was inhaled and the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was maintained at 0.8-1.0 MAC.Before induction (T1),at pyloric muscle retraction (T2),and at 4,8,12 and 24 h after operation (T3-6),blood samples were collected from the central vein for determination of plasma concentrations of cortisol and interleukin-6 (IL-6).Pain was assessed using CRIES score at T3-6.When CRIES scores ＞ 3,10％ chloral hydrate 0.5 ml/kg was given by retention enema for analgesia,and the requirement for chloral hydrate was recorded.The emergence time,extubation time,duration of stay in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital discharge time were recorded.Bradycardia and hypotension during operation,and development of motor block of lower extremities,infection and dehiscence of incision,vomiting,and urinary retention after operation were also recorded.Results Compared with group C,no significant changes were found in the emergence time,extubation time,duration of stay in PACU,hospital discharge time,plasma concentrations of cortisol and IL-6,the requirement for chloral hydrate,and the incidence of bradycardia,hypotension,motor block of lower extremities,and infection and dehiscence of incision in 0.10％ L1 and 0.15 ％ L1 groups,the emergence time,extubation time,duration of stay in PACU,hospital discharge time were significantly shortened,and the plasma concentrations of cortisol and IL-6,requirement for chloral hydrate,and the incidence of hypotension and infection of incision were decreased in 0.10％ L2 and 0.15％ L2 groups,and the incidence of vomiting and urinary retention was increased in 0.15％ L1 and 0.15％ L2 groups.Compared with group 0.10％ L2,the incidence of vomiting and urinary retention was significantly decreased,and no significant changes were found in the other parameters mentioned above in 0.15％ L2 group.Conclusion The optimum concentration and dose of ropivacaine are 0.10％ and 1.2 ml/kg,respectively,for caudal block in the neonates undergoing laparotomy under general anesthesia.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided sacral block in the obese patients by comparing it with the traditional positioning method.Methods Sixty obese patients,aged 25-50 yr,weighing 56-80 kg,with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2,scheduled for elective anorectal surgery,were randomly divided into 2 groups (n =30 each) using a random number table:ultrasound-guided sacral block group (group U) and traditional positioning method group (group T).The sacral canal puncture point was located via either ultrasonic or traditional positioning method.After successful puncture,1％ lidocaine 20 ml was injected.The number of patients in whom puncture was successful at first attempt and the number of patients in whom the time for puncture ≤ 1 min were recorded.The adverse reactions were observed.The efficacy of sacral block was evaluated.Results Compared with group T,the success rate of puncture at first attempt was significantly increased (P ＜ 0.05),and no significant changes were found in the number of patients in whom the time for puncture ≤ 1 min or efffcacy of sacral block in group U (P ＞ 0.05).No adverse reactions were found in the two groups.Conclusion Ultrasound-guided sacral block can raise the success rate of puncture at first attempt and provide similar efficacy of block in the obese patients when compared with the traditional positioning method,and thus has significant clinical value.
ABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi desenvolver uma técnica simples e prática para a cateterização crônica em canal peridural sacral de coelhos. MÉTODOS: O estudo incluiu dez coelhos com peso entre 2 e 2,5 kg. Após a anestesia e a analgesia, colocamos um cateter peridural através de uma incisão longitudinal de 2 cm na cauda acima da região do hiato sacral. Confirmamos a localização com a administração de lidocaína a 1% (nivelamento da perda sensorial e da função motora dos membros inferiores). O cateter foi introduzido através de um túnel subcutâneo até o pescoço, onde foi fixado. RESULTADOS: A implantação de cateter crônico peridural caudal foi bem-sucedida em todos os coelhos. Os cateteres permaneceram eficazmente no lugar por dez dias, sem intercorrências durante esse período. A localização do cateter foi reconfirmada por lidocaína a 1% no último dia. Após matar os animais, procedeu-se laminectomia para localização do cateter no espaço peridural. CONCLUSÕES: Há vários métodos de cateterização do espaço peridural em modelos animais na literatura. A cateterização do espaço peridural em coelhos pode ser feita através das vias atlanto-occipital, lombar ou caudal por amputação da cauda. As técnicas de cateterização intratecal e peridural descritas na literatura exigem perícia cirúrgica e conhecimento de procedimentos cirúrgicos, como laminectomia e amputação da cauda. A nossa técnica não requer grande habilidade cirúrgica, a integridade anatômica foi preservada e não houve mau posicionamento de cateter. Em conclusão, podemos sugerir que a nova técnica de cateterização peridural é simples, facilmente aplicável e pode ser usada em estudos experimentais de modelos animais.
INTRODUCTION: In this study we aimed to develop a simple and practical technique for chronic sacral epidural catheterization of rabbits. METHODS: We included ten rabbits weighing 2-2.5 kg in the study. After anesthesia and analgesia, we placed an epidural catheter by a 2cm longitudinal skin incision in the tail above the sacral hiatus region. We confirmed localization by giving 1% lidocaine (leveling sensory loss and motor function loss of the lower extremity). The catheter was carried forward through a subcutaneous tunnel and fixed at the neck. RESULTS: Chronic caudal epidural catheter placement was succesful in all rabbits. The catheters stayed in place effectively for ten days. We encountered no catheter complications during this period. The localization of the catheter was reconfirmed by 1% lidocaine on the last day. After animals killing, we performed a laminectomy and verified localization of the catheter in the epidural space. CONCLUSIONS: Various methods for catheterization of the epidural space in animal models exist in the literature. Epidural catheterization of rabbits can be accomplished by atlanto-occipital, lumbar or caudal routes by amputation of the tail. Intrathecal and epidural catheterization techniques defined in the literature necessitate surgical skill and knowledge of surgical procedures like laminectomy and tail amputation. Our technique does not require substantial surgical skill, anatomical integrity is preserved and malposition of the catheter is not encountered. In conclusion, we suggest that our simple and easily applicable new epidural catheterization technique can be used as a model in experimental animal studies.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar una técnica sencilla y práctica para la cateterización crónica en canal epidural sacral de conejos. MÉTODOS: El estudio incluyó diez conejos con peso entre 2 y 2,5 kg. Después de la anestesia y la analgesia, pusimos un catéter epidural por medio de una incisión longitudinal de 2 cm en la cola por encima de la región del hiato sacral. Confirmamos la localización con la administración de lidocaína al 1% (nivelación de la pérdida sensorial y de la función motora de los miembros inferiores). El catéter se introdujo por medio de un túnel subcutáneo hasta el cuello, en dónde finalmente se fijó. RESULTADOS: La implantación de catéter crónico epidural de cola fue exitosa en todos los conejos. Los catéteres permanecieron eficazmente en el lugar por diez días, sin intercurrencias durante ese período. La ubicación del catéter fue reconfirmada por la lidocaína al 1% en el último día. Después de sacrificar a los animales, se procedió a la laminectomía y se verificó la ubicación del catéter en el espacio epidural. CONCLUSIONES: En la literatura existen varios métodos de cateterización del espacio epidural en modelos animales. La cateterización del espacio epidural en conejos puede ser hecha por medio de las vías atlanto-occipital, lumbar o de cola por amputación de la cola. Las técnicas de cateterización intratecal y epidural descritas en la literatura exigen una pericia quirúrgica y el conocimiento de procedimientos quirúrgicos, como la laminectomía y la amputación de la cola. Nuestra técnica no requiere gran habilidad quirúrgica, la integridad anatómica se preservó y no hubo un mal posicionamiento del catéter. Como conclusión, podemos sugerir que la nueva técnica de cateterización epidural es sencilla, fácilmente aplicable y que puede ser usada en estudios experimentales de modelos animales.
Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Catheterization/methods , Epidural Space/anatomy & histology , Lumbosacral RegionABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical application of caudal block combined anesthesia with sevoflurane in pediatric hernia.Methods 102 patients were randomly divided into three groups:caudal block combined with sevoflurane (A group),caudal block combined with isoflurane and sevoflurane combined with ketamine.HR,MAP,SpO2,anaesthetic effect,the recovery time,the awake time and the adverse reaction were observed.Results The HR,MAP,SpO2 in A and B group had no significant difference before and after anesthesia (P ＞ 0.05).The HR,MAP,SpO2 in C group had statistically significant difference before and after anesthesia(t =10.121,6.681,4.469,all P ＜ 0.05).Compared with A and B group,the recovery time and the awake time in C group were longer significantly(t =8.240,11.693,all P ＜0.05).Compared with B group,the recovery time and the awake time in A group had no statistically significant difference(P ＞ 0.05).Compared with C group,the adverse reaction in A group had no statistically significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).Compared with B group,the adverse reaction in A group had statistically significant difference (x2 =3.923,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The caudal block combined anesthesia with sevoflurane in pediatric hernia has a good effect and security.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo observe the effcacy of isoflurane supplemented with ropivacaine for sacral block in indirect inguinal hernia.Methods120 cases of children who were going to be operated in inguinal hernia repairs were randomly divided into isoflurane group( A),ropivacaine group( B ),and isoflurane supplemented with ropivacaine group(C).Sacral block was performed after induction with different anesthetics.Haemodynamics( MAP、HR 、SpO2 ) in three groups were compared,and anesthesia effect,waking time,drug dosage and adverse reactions were analyzed.ResultsHaemodynamics in isoflurane supplemented with ropivacaine group were more stable than the other two groups,and anesthesia effect was better than isoflurane group and ropivacaine group( all P ＜0.05).Moreover,waking time,drug dosage and adverse reactions in group C were statistical differently conpared with controls( all P ＜ 0.05 ).ConclusionIsoflurane supplemented with ropivacaine for sacral block was helpful for respiration and circulation management applied in indirect inguinal hernia and could be a perfect anesthetic methods.
ABSTRACT
Introdução: a síndrome de Edwards, ou trissomia do 18, é uma anomalia cromossômica rara e frequentemente fatal. Os pacientes que sobrevivem têm múltiplas malformações, que resultam em risco anestésico aumentado, mesmo em cirurgias de menor porte. Objetivo: discutir o uso da anestesia caudal, em associação com anestesia geral, como técnica anestésica e analgésica para cirurgia abdominal em criança portadora de síndrome de Edwards. Relato do caso: criança de 75 dias de idade, 2,9 kg, com diagnóstico de síndrome de Edwards e cardiopatia congênita, foi submetida à correção de refluxo gastroesofágico sob anestesia geral combinada ao bloqueio peridural caudal com bupivacaína 0,125%, morfina e clonidina. A anestesia geral foi mantida com sevoflurano, sem a necessidade do uso endovenoso de opioides. O paciente manteve estabilidade durante todo o procedimento cirúrgico. No final da cirurgia, o anestésico inalatório foi suspenso e a paciente foi extubada na sala de ciurgia após 17 minutos. O pós-operatório foi realizado em centro de terapia intensiva, sem intercorrências e sem a necessidade do uso suplementar de analgésicos. Conclusão: a anestesia geral inalatória combinada com o bloqueio caudal mostrou-se técnica anestésica segura e satisfatória em crianças com síndrome de Edwards.
Introduction: Edwards syndrome or trisomy 18 is a rare and often fatal chromosome abnormality. Patients who survive are dysmorphic with multiple malformations leading to an increase anesthetic risk even during small surgery. Objective: to discuss the use of caudal anesthesia combined with general anesthesia as an anesthetic and analgesic technique for abdominal surgery in a child with Edwards?s syndrome. Case report: a girl with 75-day-old, 2.9 kg, with Edward?s syndrome and congenital heart disease who underwent surgical correction of gastroesophageal reflux with combined caudal-general anaesthesia using 0.125% bupivacaine, morphine and clonidine. General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and no opioid was used. Throughout the procedure, no major changes in the monitored parameters were recorded. At the completion of the procedure, the inhalational agent was discontinued and the patient was extubated in the operating room after 17 min. The postoperative period at the intensive care unit was uneventful and no postoperative analgesics were necessary. Conclusion: inhalatory general anesthesia associated with caudal anesthesia seems to be a good and safe technique in children with Edwards?s syndrome.
ABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O bloqueio peridural caudal é a mais popular entre todas as técnicas de anestesia regional em crianças. Com o avanço da idade, apenas a relativa dificuldade em localizar o hiato sacral limita seu uso. Entretanto, em adultos a técnica vem sendo largamente utilizada para controle de dor crônica com o auxílio da fluoroscopia. Assim, a habilidade em localizar o hiato e definir as variações anatômicas é o principal fator determinante do sucesso e segurança na execução do bloqueio peridural pela via caudal. Nesse contexto, o ultrassom vem ganhando espaço como guia para a realização do bloqueio caudal. O objetivo desta revisão foi elucidar o papel do ultrassom na anestesia caudal, além de demonstrar que o bloqueio caudal, muito utilizado em crianças, também é útil e pode ser usado em adultos. CONTEÚDO: Uma revisão literária sobre a anatomia da região sacral e da técnica anestésica necessária para a realização adequada do bloqueio caudal foi promovida. Além disso, artigos recentes sobre estudos realizados com bloqueios peridurais caudais guiados por ultrassom tanto em crianças quanto em adultos também foram incluídos. CONCLUSÕES: O ultrassom, apesar de suas limitações, pode ser útil como ferramenta adjuvante no posicionamento da agulha no espaço caudal. Permite a fácil identificação da anatomia sacral, além de visualização da injeção, em tempo real. Sua natureza portátil, não invasiva e livre de exposição à radiação faz dele uma tecnologia atrativa na sala operatória, principalmente na emergência de casos difíceis. Entretanto, como seu uso em bloqueios centrais do neuroeixo ainda é muito primitivo, é necessário que mais pesquisas sejam feitas para se consagre como técnica de rotina na prática anestésica.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Caudal epidural anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique used in children. With advanced age, only the relative difficulty in localizing the sacral hiatus limits its use. However, in adults this technique has been widely used to control chronic pain by adjuvant use of fluoroscopy. Thus, the ability to locate the hiatus and define anatomical variations is the main determinant of the success and safety of caudal epidural anesthesia. In this context, the use of the ultrasound in caudal epidural anesthesia has been increasing. The objective of this review was to determine the role of the ultrasound in caudal epidural anesthesia and to demonstrate that this technique, widely used in children, is also useful and can be used in adults. CONTENT: A review of the literature on sacral anatomy and the anesthetic technique necessary to perform caudal epidural anesthesia was undertaken. Recent studies in ultrasound-guided caudal epidural anesthesia both in children and adults were also included. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limitations, the ultrasound can be a useful tool to position the needle in the caudal space. It allows prompt identification of the sacral anatomy and real-time visualization of the injection. Considering it is portable, non-invasive, and free of radiation exposure, it is an attractive technique in the operating room especially in difficult cases. However, since its use in neuroaxis anesthesia is very primitive, more studies are necessary to make it a routine technique in anesthetic practice.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: El bloqueo epidural caudal es la más popular entre todas las técnicas de anestesia regional en niños. Cuando la edad avanza, apenas la relativa dificultad en localizar el hiato sacral limita su uso. Sin embargo, en los adultos, la técnica ha venido siendo ampliamente utilizada para el control del dolor crónico, con la ayuda de la fluoroscopía. Por lo tanto, la habilidad en poder ubicar el hiato y definir las variaciones anatómicas es el principal factor determinante del éxito y de la seguridad en la ejecución del bloqueo epidural por la vía caudal. En ese contexto, el ultrasonido ha venido ganando espacio como guía para la realización del bloqueo caudal. El objetivo de esta revisión fue elucidar el papel del ultrasonido en la anestesia caudal, además de demostrar que el bloqueo caudal, muy utilizado en niños, también es útil y puede ser usado en adultos. CONTENIDO: Se hizo una revisión literaria sobre la anatomía de la región sacral y de la técnica anestésica necesaria para la adecuada realización del bloqueo caudal. Además, también se incluyeron artículos recientes sobre estudios realizados con bloqueos epidurales caudales guiados por ultrasonido tanto en niños como en adultos. CONCLUSIONES: El ultrasonido, a pesar de sus limitaciones, puede ser útil como una herramienta coadyuvante en el posicionamiento de la aguja en el espacio caudal. Permite la fácil identificación de la anatomía sacral, además de la visualización de la inyección en tiempo real. Su naturaleza portátil, no invasiva y libre de exposición a la radiación, lo convierte en una tecnología atractiva en quirófano, principalmente en las situaciones de emergencia de casos complicados. Sin embargo, como su uso en bloqueos centrales del neuro eje todavía es muy primitivo, se hacen necesarias más investigaciones para que se consagre como una técnica de rutina en la práctica anestésica.
Subject(s)
Adult , Child , Humans , Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSE).Methods 40 patients,who intended to undergo elective lower limb or perineum surgery,were randomly divided into two groups,each with 20 cases,ropivacaine were used in treatment group,while bupivacaine in control group the differences of feeling,motor block and recovery time,as well as their side effect in the two groups were compared.Results The maximum of spread time of anesthesia and the recovery time,and side effect in treatment group were similar to those in control group.The onset time of motor block and the peak time of motor block were longer in treatment group than that in control group,the maximum modified Bromage scale in treatment group was lower than that in control group(P
ABSTRACT
Epidural steroid therapy is a commonly applied "conservative" therapy in the management of acute and chronic back pain, but it is not inherently benign. As the indications for epidural steroid injections increase so do the reports of adverse responses associated with this procedure. Although generalized erythema, retinal hemorrhage, infection, and lipomatosis have been reported, acute generalized ecchymosis has not been reported as a complication of either caudal or spinal epidural steroid injection. We describe here an unique case of transient, profound generalized ecchymosis after receiving an caudal epidural steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy.
Subject(s)
Back Pain , Ecchymosis , Erythema , Lipomatosis , Radiculopathy , Retinal HemorrhageABSTRACT
To compare the efficacy and side effects of bupivaeaine(Bup)at two concentrations and fentanyl for caudal analgesia in children. Method:One hundred-fifty children undergoing hernia repair procedures under caudal anesthesia, were randomly assigned to five groups. Group A: 1% lidocaine (Lid), group B: 10% Lid+0.1% Bup, group C: 1% Lid+0.25% Baeup, group D: 1%Lid+0.15%Bup with 2?g?kg~(-1) fentanyl, group E: 1%Lid+0. 25%Bup with 2?g?kg~(-1) fentanyl for caudal analgesia, The degree of pain(LPS), nausea and vomiting (NV) were as sessed at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after operation. Result: The numbers of LPS
ABSTRACT
The anesthetic management of patients with pheochromocytoma presents many difficult problems, such as hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypotension. A 21 year-old male underwent resection of pheochromocytoma under general anesthesia with isoflurane and fentanyl. Hypertensive crisis during induction of anesthesia and surgical manipulation of the tumor were managed with phentolamine and sodium nitroprusside drips. Anesthesia was maintained wtih nitrous oxide : oxygen, 50% : 50%, isoflurane, 0.5-2% and supplemented with fractional doses of fentanyl and vecuronium for muscular relaxation. We also used propranolol for the cardiac arrhythmia. An endotracheal semi-closed circle absorption technique with controlled ventilation was employed. Fentanyl does not release histamine, and has stable hemodynamics. Isoflurane has also advocated on the grounds that arrhythmias are less esaily provocated by circulating catecholamines than with other volatile agents, and has been shown to be a satisfactory agent. Vecuronium does not provoke catecholamine release, does not release histamine, has no autonomic effects at clinical plasma concentrations, and is clearly the neuromuscular blocking agent of choice in this case. Optimal pre-operative preparation, smooth induction of anesthesia, adequate alveolar ventilation, proper cardiovascular control, and good communication between surgeon and anesthesiologist are most important for the anesthetic management of pheochromocytoma.